I have a special post today! Special because this is a guest post from Rod Pyle, author of Missions to the Moon (Sterling, July 2009) – THANKS ROD!
By the way, if any of you got the book: MARS 3-D, a really fun book with 3-D images of Mars you can look at with a built in viewer; you will be happy to know there is a new one out called MOON 3-D. I haven’t had the chance to pick this up yet but it is number one on my list – put it on yours.
Take it away Rod:
The planet Mars wails its siren song across the wastes of space as loudly today as it has since the first dreams of voyaging there. The question is: can we still hear it?
While traveling to Mars has been in the minds of humans since at least the mid-1800’s, it was not until after WWII that people because serious about the idea. By the time the Apollo project was winding down, there were extensive plans to use Apollo-era hardware to make the trip.
But the realities of shifting political agendas and shrinking scientific and engineering budgets caught up with space exploration. In the end, the US was lucky to have the low-budget compromise called the Space Shuttle. The later International Space Station was trimmed-down frosting on the thin cake. So it may seem odd, after the dull but quietly competent accomplishments of these programs and whilst in the midst of the worse economic climate since the Great Depression, to be planning a return to Mars.
But consider the facts. Money for space travel is not shoveled into a capsule and shot into the dark skies above. Space funding- all of it- is spent here, on Earth, and for NASA overwhelmingly in the United States. In fact, other than weapons, space exploration may be the only major national program with such an internally advantageous result.
NASA’s adventures have always honed the best of the American edge. Higher education, graduating legions of engineers, physicists, and other scientific practitioners has always benefitted from these programs. Aerospace has traditionally found at least a partial home in space efforts, and one of the few in which it can universally help mankind as opposed to contributing to his destruction.
And the large NASA programs have benefitted other, less obvious segments of humanity. The media has long found a rich lode of drama to mine within the Mercury, Gemini and especially Apollo programs. No less a personality than Tom Hanks, the James Stewart of his time, was dramatically influenced and even given meaning by the grand sweep of Apollo.
Then of course there are the technological spinoffs: digital computers, heat-resistant materials, medical treatments, environmentally beneficial techniques across industry; these and more are a direct result of the years and dollars that equated with the race to the moon.
And so when we ask ourselves: should we return to the moon? Send people to Mars? Visit the asteroids, or even simply maintain an orbital presence; we are echoing the rhetorical question perhaps best put forth by JFK himself… “Why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas? We choose to go to the moon…” And Mars, and beyond. Not because it is easy but because, as we have found time and again, it is indeed hard. And that has always brought out the best in the American spirit.